Trump HHS Nominee Dodges Cantwell Questions on Admin’s Proposed $18B in Medical Research Cuts
During his Finance Committee hearing, James O’Neill pleads ignorance when asked about Trump’s massive budget cut proposal for NIH: “I haven’t had a chance to review the details”; White House proposal released Friday would slash 40% of NIH research funding and “reform” its priorities to align with Trump
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA), senior member of the Senate Finance Committee and ranking member of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, pressed James O’Neill – President Trump’s nominee to serve as Deputy Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) -- on the Trump administration’s latest budget proposal that would wipe out $18 billion from the National Institute of Health (NIH), the federal agency tasked with lifesaving medical research.
“Mr. O'Neill, do you support the proposed $18 billion cuts to NIH funding?” asked Sen. Cantwell.
O’Neill responded: “Senator, I had no involvement in the development of any proposed budgets. I think it's important to pursue gold standard research, and anything we can do to improve NIH, ensure that it's promoting gold standard research, ensuring that it's funding research that replicates seems completely reasonable to me.”
Sen. Cantwell: “You mean the proposed cuts seem reasonable because there's some stuff we're doing that isn't gold standard?”
O’Neill: “Senator, I believe the President's proposal for NIH suggests combining some separate institutes of NIH into single institutes, where the functions belong together to reduce duplication.”
Sen. Cantwell: “That would cut $18 billion?”
O’Neill: “Senator, I haven't had a chance to review the details that went into the budget. All I can say is I did not participate in that decision.”
Sen. Cantwell: “Okay, well, I'm looking for a little bit of philosophy here. I come from a part of the world where we like innovation. We certainly like NIH investment in that because we look at it and say, ‘How are we going to reduce these unbelievable costs of a Baby Boomer population reaching retirement and having huge demand?’ So places like the University of Washington have done incredible work on Alzheimer's research. So we're going to strive to solve these huge health care costs by innovation, not by shortcutting innovation.”
On Friday, President Trump released a budget proposal that would cut NIH research funding by $17.97 billion and “reform” the agency so that its remaining $27 billion for research aligns with his administration’s priorities. The budget also proposes more than $3.5 billion in cuts to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
In Washington state, NIH funding supports over 12,000 jobs and more than $3 billion in economic activity.
Last month, National Science Foundation (NSF) Director Sethuraman Panchanathan resigned after the White House directed the NSF to accept a 55% cut in funding – part of “a deliberate dismemberment of America's innovation engine,” Sen. Cantwell said at the time.
In February, Sen. Cantwell joined the entire Senate Democratic Caucus in sending a letter to U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. expressing serious alarm over the Trump Administration’s decisions that threatened to undermine America’s life-saving biomedical research infrastructure, in violation of federal law. The letter followed her strong opposition to RFK Jr.’s nomination, which she articulated in a speech on the Senate floor:
“Now we are at the possibility of the beginning of another crisis, the avian flu. This crisis is yet another reminder of the importance of medical research and collaboration,” Sen. Cantwell said in her February floor speech. “Does it make sense to cut science at the time we might have another pandemic? Does it make sense to continue to cut the collaborative efforts of research?”
Video of Sen. Cantwell’s Q&A today is available HERE, audio HERE, and a full transcript is HERE.
###
Next Article Previous Article
