Cantwell, Collins Lead Bipartisan Effort to Make Home Health Services More Accessible to Medicare Patients
50 senators call on CMS to make new eligibility rules less burdensome by easing documentation requirements
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senators Maria Cantwell (D-WA) and Susan Collins (R-ME) led a bipartisan group of 50 senators in calling on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to ease new rules hindering Medicare recipients’ access to home health services.
The 2010 Affordable Care Act required documentation of face-to-face encounters prior to certification for home health services in order to increase the involvement of the physician in care planning for the patient and maintain the integrity of the patient-doctor relationship. CMS developed the final rules, which the senators say go beyond the certification requirement as required by the Affordable Care Act and impose an unnecessary burden on Medicare patients.
In Washington state, approximately 37,000 Medicare enrollees were served in 2009 by home health services out of roughly one million Medicare enrollees, and providers made more than 806,000 visits, according to Kaiser. Nationally, 3.2 million individuals were served by home health services in 2009.
“Specifically, we are concerned about the documentation requirements in the rule placed upon ordering physicians, which are burdensome, duplicative, and impractical for many doctors, especially those in rural and underserved areas,” the senators wrote in a letter to CMS Administrator Donald Berwick.“Without the easing of these documentation requirements, there will be a negative impact on home health recipients’ access to home health providers and home health care. …We ask that CMS consider the above-mentioned alternatives to the burdensome and duplicative requirements of section 6407 and encourage continued access to home health services for Medicare recipients.”
Last December, Cantwell and Collins led a bipartisan letter to CMS urging the delay of the face-to-face requirement implementation date to allow home healthcare providers more time to prepare. CMS had only issued its notice in mid-November for a January 1, 2011 implementation date, and many in the home health community said it was an insufficient amount of time to ensure they were in compliance with the new rules. As a result, CMS delayed implementation to April 1, 2011.
The full text of the letter sent today follows:
May 18, 2011
Donald Berwick, M.D.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
200 Independence Ave, SW
Washington, DC 20201
Dear Dr. Berwick,
This letter is in follow up to the December 17, 2010 bipartisan Senate letter urging the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to delay implementation of the final rule for section 6407 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (P.L. 111-148), requiring documentation of face-to-face encounters prior to certification for home health services. Thank you for your recognition of the burden that the January 1, 2011, implementation of this provision would have created both for providers and Medicare home health recipients, especially those in rural and underserved areas. CMS subsequently set an implementation date of April 1, 2011, for this provision.
We write in follow up to implementation of this provision to express concerns about burdens these rules impose, especially the documentation requirements, and the potential negative impact of these rules on access to home health services for Medicare recipients. The documentation requirements imposed by these rules go beyond the certification requirement in section 6407 of the Affordable Care Act.
Specifically, we are concerned about the documentation requirements in the rule placed upon ordering physicians, which are burdensome, duplicative, and impractical for many doctors, especially those in rural and underserved areas. For instance, CMS requires that physicians complete narratives describing how the patient’s clinical condition observed during the encounter supports the patient’s qualification for Medicare-covered home health services. The physician who conducts the encounter and certifies the patient’s eligibility for home health services must record and sign a detailed face-to-face narrative directly on the home health certification or review and sign required encounter information extracted from his or her record by his or her own staff. Furthermore, only the physician may document the required narrative for face-to-face encounters made by non-physician practitioners. Failure to complete this narrative results in non-payment for the home health services. Physicians with multiple potential home health patients would be especially burdened by this requirement, which is also time consuming.
In addition, this documentation requirement is duplicative. Physicians record patient’s homebound status and condition on multiple forms, including the patient’s medical records as well as the patient plan of care. While we understand that CMS allows the physician to attach existing documentation to the certification, this approach still inordinately increases paperwork burdens for already overstretched physicians.
In consideration of the burden this requirement places upon physicians, we ask that you consider eliminating the narrative requirement and accept the physician’s sworn certification of the patient’s need for home health services in lieu of this, or alternatively, permitting the use of the model Physician Certification and Plan of Care (formerly Form 485) to meet the documentation requirements in lieu of the narrative. Alternatively, we ask for your consideration that non-physician practitioners and home health agency health professionals be allowed to complete the form for patient history and need for services, provided the physician acknowledges the clinical finding and certifies the need for home health services with his or her signature.
CMS allows physician staff, hospital staff, nursing home personnel, and virtually everyone else to transpose physician assessments and other clinical information for the physician to sign off on. Further, in all other care settings there is no requirement that prohibits a professional health care provider such as a nurse or therapist from working in collaboration with the doctor on patient care and documentation. These professionals put their licenses on the line if they improperly document. There is no evidence that these professionals breach their responsibilities to a degree that warrants prohibiting them from the same allowances afforded to other providers.
Without the easing of these documentation requirements, there will be a negative impact on home health recipients’ access to home health providers and home health care. Physicians will be discouraged from accepting home health patients, and therefore, hospital discharges will be delayed and/or patients will be sent to post-acute institutions, which entail higher costs for the patients and Medicare. Some patients in rural and underserved areas may be unable to access providers to certify their eligibility for home health services, therefore, going without the needed home health services that several surveys have shown that the majority of seniors prefer over institutional care. In addition, small home health agencies and non-profits will be disproportionately impacted by these requirements. According to a recent survey, home health agencies report that after educating physicians on the requirement, 46 percent have indicated that they will refer patients to other care settings instead of home health care. This means patients will be steered to more costly institutional care that would result in poorer clinical outcomes for the patients.
These requirements place a disproportionate impact on vulnerable patients and perpetuate the bias towards institutional care. We ask that CMS consider the above-mentioned alternatives to the burdensome and duplicative requirements of section 6407 and encourage continued access to home health services for Medicare recipients. Thank you for your consideration.
Senator Maria Cantwell Senator Susan Collins
Senator Daniel K. Akaka Senator Kelly Ayotte
Senator Scott Brown Senator Mark Begich
Senator Michael Bennet Senator Richard Blumenthal
Senator Roy Blunt Senator Sherrod Brown
Senator Richard Burr Senator Saxby Chambliss
Senator Benjamin Cardin Senator Robert Casey Jr.
Senator Daniel Coats Senator Thad Cochran
Senator Kent Conrad Senator Christopher Coons
Senator Mike Crapo Senator Kirsten Gillibrand
Senator Kay Hagan Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison
Senator James Inhofe Senator Johnny Isakson
Senator Tim Johnson Senator Mark Kirk
Senator Amy Klobuchar Senator Mary Landrieu
Senator Frank Lautenberg Senator Patrick Leahy
Senator Carl Levin Senator Robert Menendez
Senator Jeff Merkley Senator Barbara Mikulski
Senator Jerry Moran Senator Patty Murray
Senator Lisa Murkowski Senator Ben Nelson
Senator Rob Portman Senator James Risch
Senator Bernie Sanders Senator Charles Schumer
Senator Olympia Snowe Senator Jeanne Shaheen
Senator Debbie Stabenow Senator Jon Tester
Senator Roger Wicker Senator Ron Wyden
Senator Mark Udall Senator Tom Udall
Next Article Previous Article